Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Williams v. State

Williams v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 7, 2003 · Ervin, Kahn, Padovano
839 So. 2d 853; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2855; 2003 WL 826024 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Williams v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the briefs, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We therefore affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of the judgment and sentence. Because the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑