Hanson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Hanson v. State, 839 So. 2d 859 (2003)
2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3114; 2003 WL 1030045
Northcutt, Salcines, Stringer

Hanson v. State

Opinion of the Court

STRINGER, Judge.

Oscar Hanson challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

In his motion, Hanson alleged that his pleas were involuntary because trial counsel affirmatively misadvised him that the convictions could not be used in the future as prior offenses for sentencing purposes. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Oscar HANSON v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published