Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Hanson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 12, 2003 · Northcutt, Salcines, Stringer

839 So. 2d 859; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3114; 2003 WL 1030045 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Bates v. State (Fla. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

STRINGER, Judge.

Oscar Hanson challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

In his motion, Hanson alleged that his pleas were involuntary because trial counsel affirmatively misadvised him that the convictions could not be used in the future as prior offenses for sentencing purposes. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.