Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Alusma v. State

Alusma v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 19, 2003 · Gross, Klein
840 So. 2d 342; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1842; 2003 WL 355429 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Alusma v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Based on State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235, 236 (Fla. 1996), we are compelled to reverse the order denying post-conviction relief as to appellant’s claim that his plea was involuntary because it was based on the misadvice of counsel. We affirm the order insofar as it denies relief based on appellant’s double jeopardy claim. We remand for an evidentiary hearing or the attachment of records that conclusively refute appellant’s claim.

KLEIN, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.