Hayden v. State
Hayden v. State
841 So. 2d 580; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4052; 2003 WL 1523332
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hayden v. State
Opinion of the Court
Kenneth Hayden challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. In his motion, Hayden alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him that his conviction could not be used in the future as a prior offense for sentencing purposes. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.
Affirmed, question certified.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.