Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. MRT Micro, ASA
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. MRT Micro, ASA
841 So. 2d 675; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4809; 2003 WL 1824943
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. MRT Micro, ASA
Opinion of the Court
It is undisputed that no notice was given to the sureties, Hartford Fire Insurance Company and National Surety Corporation, and that judgment should not have been entered against them.
We, therefore, reverse and remand for entry of an amended final judgment omitting paragraph three and all other references to the sureties, and without prejudice to any relief that may subsequently be afforded pursuant to rule 1.625, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
All other issues raised on appeal are moot. As to MRT Micro, ASA, the judgment shall remain in full force and effect.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.