Brady v. State
Brady v. State
844 So. 2d 772; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7038; 2003 WL 21076705
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
Because the record does not refute appellant’s facially valid claim that he timely requested his attorney to file a post conviction motion, which his attorney failed to do, we reverse the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus to file a belated Rule 3.850 motion. This case
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.