Brady v. State
Brady v. State
844 So. 2d 772; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7038; 2003 WL 21076705
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Brady v. State
Opinion of the Court
Because the record does not refute appellant’s facially valid claim that he timely requested his attorney to file a post conviction motion, which his attorney failed to do, we reverse the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus to file a belated Rule 3.850 motion. This case
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.