Emmanuel v. State
Emmanuel v. State
844 So. 2d 807; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7070; 2003 WL 21076277
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Emmanuel v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s, Thomas Emmanuel, conviction on the charge of impregnating a child under the age of sixteen; however, we remand for resentencing. Appellee concedes, and we agree, appellant must be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines rather than the 1995 sentencing guidelines with a corrected sc.oresheet as argued by appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.