Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

DeShone v. DeShone

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 2, 2003 · Ervin, Hawkes, Kahn

846 So. 2d 658; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8228; 2003 WL 21250905 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Shiver v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Arthur (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellee’s “Response to Appellant’s Response to Order to Show Cause,” which the Court treats as a motion to dismiss1, the Court *659has determined that the motion for rehearing below was not authorized. See Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Assocs., Inc., 263 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1972). Consequently, the motion did not delay rendition of the order on appeal and the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, the appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed as untimely.

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

. The Court directed the appellant to show cause why the motion should not be granted and the appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdic*659tion. However, the appellant has failed to respond.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.