Hall v. State
Hall v. State
Opinion of the Court
Tracy Linda Hall appeals her judgment and sentence for one count of trafficking in amphetamine. See § 893.135, Fla. Stat. (2001). The offense occurred on May 15, 2001. She pleaded nolo contendere to this charge and received a sentence of three years’ imprisonment including a three-year minimum mandatory term. While Ms. Hall’s direct appeal was pending, she filed a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) to correct a sentencing error. She maintained that the minimum mandatory term could not be imposed in light of this court’s opinion in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). The trial court granted the motion and resentenced her to three years in prison without a minimum mandatory term.
As a result of the successful rule 3.800(b)(2) motion, Hall’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm her appeal.
As a result of the successful rule 3.800(b)(2) motion, the State appealed the order granting relief and the new sentence, arguing that chapter 2002-212, Laws of Florida, provided for retroactive application of the statute. We rejected this argument in Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). But see Clayton v. State, 842 So.2d 971 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the State’s appeal.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.