Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Burttram v. State

Burttram v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 4, 2003 · Altenbernd, Covington, Silberman
846 So. 2d 1201; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8295; 2003 WL 21275999 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Burttram v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Burttram appeals the judgment and sentence that were entered after this court remanded his case to the trial court. See Burttram v. State, 780 So.2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Counsel filed briefs asserting no meritorious argument pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree with counsel that no meritorious issues exist, and we therefore affirm. We write only to correct a scrivener’s error. Second-degree murder is a first-degree felony punishable by life, not a second-degree felony as indicated on the judgment. See § 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). We direct the trial court to correct the judgment to indicate that the conviction is for a first-degree felony.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and SILBERMAN and COVINGTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.