Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Torres v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

Torres v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 11, 2003 · Cope, Ramirez, Shevin
847 So. 2d 568; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8756; 2003 WL 21347177 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Torres v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellants seek review of an adverse summary judgment on insurance coverage. As to the procedural point, see Tingle v. Dade County Board of County Commissioners, 245 So.2d 76, 78 (Fla. 1971) (successor judge may “vacate or modify the interlocutory rulings or orders *569of his predecessor in the case”) (emphasis in original); Wasa International Ins. Co. v. Hurtado, 749 So.2d 579, 580 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). On the merits, we entirely agree with Judge Leesfield that the insurance policy by its terms excluded coverage for the appellants-lessees.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑