Champaign National Bank & Trust v. SOS Industries, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- DANIEL DRISCOLL v. ERIC KNELLINGER AND US FEDERAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION, INC. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
- Mariner Health Care v. Griffith (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Champaign National Bank and Trust seeks certiorari review of an interlocutory order denying Champaign’s renewed motion for judgment on the pleadings. We deny the petition for writ of certiorari.
Champaign argues that irreparable harm exists in this case to justify certiorari review based on an alleged pattern of
Certiorari is not a writ of expediency and cannot be used to circumvent the non-final appeal rule. See S.H. v. Dept. of Children and Families, 769 So.2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Hawaiian Inn of Daytona Beach, Inc. v. Snead Const. Carp., 393 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Champaign’s alleged “special burden” does not create irreparable harm to justify cer-tiorari review. Any alleged pretrial “harassment” should be addressed to the trial court in its sound discretion to control the case below.
PETITION DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.