Mitchell v. State
Mitchell v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant has appealed the denial of his Rule 3.800(a) “Motion To Correct Sentencing Error.” Because this is his ninth collateral appeal/petition, this court issued a Spencer
Notwithstanding appellant’s excuse, he is the one responsible for his court filings. He has apparently exhausted all available arguments concerning his sentence, and he has exhausted the court’s capacity for consideration of attacks on his 1989 Brevard County convictions. Appellant is therefore
AFFIRMED.
. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.