Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Gonzalez v. State

Gonzalez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 2, 2003 · Gersten, Green, Levy
848 So. 2d 435; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9922; 2003 WL 21503201 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Gonzalez v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Conflict is certified with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d *436544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), rev. dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2002).

Concurring Opinion

GREEN, J.

(specially concurring).

The doctrine of stare decisis compels me to join in the affirmance of this cause, but I continue to adhere to the view that Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2002), was correct in its conclusion that Chapter Law 99-188, Laws of Florida, violates the single subject rule of the Florida Constitution, accord Carlson v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2162, — So.2d -, 2002 WL 31202145 (Fla. 5th DCA Oct. 4, 2002).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.