Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Yorke v. Yorke

Yorke v. Yorke
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 3, 2003 · Kahn, Nortwick, Webster
848 So. 2d 1215; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10121; 2003 WL 21510815 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Yorke v. Yorke

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Robert P. Yorke seeks review of the trial court’s order that granted the amended petition for modification filed by Rhonda Yorke, the former wife, thereby reducing her child support obligation. Although the amended petition raised material issues of fact, only argument of counsel, and no evidence, was presented at the hearing on the amended petition. Appellant argues that the entry of the order without the benefit of evidence was a denial of due process constituting reversible error. See Rucker v. City of Ocala, 684 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). In response, appel-lee has filed a “Consent Motion to Reverse and Remand Matter,” which this court treats as a concession of error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter for further proceedings.

KAHN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.