Scott Earle challenges an order that denied his rule 3.850 motion for postcon-viction relief. We reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to address Earle’s sentences in light of State v. Klayman, 835 So.2d 248 (Fla. 2002); State v. Travis, 808 So.2d 194 (Fla. 2002); Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1999); see also DeFreis v. State, 814 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We find no error with the trial court’s disposition of Earle’s other claims.