Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Earle v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 11, 2003 · Polen, Shahood

851 So. 2d 742; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8779; 2003 WL 21349459 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Nichols v. State Farm Mut. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Scott Earle challenges an order that denied his rule 3.850 motion for postcon-viction relief. We reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to address Earle’s sentences in light of State v. Klayman, 835 So.2d 248 (Fla. 2002); State v. Travis, 808 So.2d 194 (Fla. 2002); Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1999); see also DeFreis v. State, 814 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We find no error with the trial court’s disposition of Earle’s other claims.

POLEN, C.J., SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.