Bufford v. State
Bufford v. State
852 So. 2d 398; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12376; 2003 WL 21976230
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bufford v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence as to the conviction for count two. However, on remand, the sentence for count two shall be corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral prison releasee reoffender adjudication on this count. As to count three, based on the state’s proper concession, we vacate the prison releasee reoffender adjudication on this count, as that conviction is not for an enumerated offense.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.