Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Wilson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 10, 2003 · Polen, Stevenson, Warner

853 So. 2d 1119; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13614; 2003 WL 22082165 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Maestas v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Robert Wilson appeals his attempted armed robbery and armed robbery convie-*1120tions. We affirm the convictions. With respect to Wilson’s sentence for count I, however, the State has conceded that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the 3.800(b)(2) motion more than sixty days after such motion was filed absent the timely filing of a motion for extension of time. See Edmond v. State, 832 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Jackson v. State, 793 So.2d 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We, therefore, reverse the sentence imposed for count I and remand for the entry of a new sentencing order.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

WARNER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.