Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Locklear v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 19, 2003 · Orfinger, Pleus, Thompson

854 So. 2d 832; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14061; 2003 WL 22148899 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Moore (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Joanna M. Locklear seeks review of an Unemployment Appeals Commission order denying her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. As is often the case, the record reveals a conflict in the evidence regarding the reason Ms. Locklear’s employment with Marcus M. Cornelius, III & Associates, P.A., ended.

Our review of the record reveals that the Commission’s determination that Ms. Locklear voluntarily left her employment, and is therefore not entitled to benefits is supported by competent, substantial evidence. De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla. 1957). Accordingly, the Commission’s order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.