Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Indelicato v. State

Indelicato v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 19, 2003 · Orfinger, Pleus, Thompson
854 So. 2d 834; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14062; 2003 WL 22148862 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Indelicato v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Anthony Indelicato appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule Criminal Procedure 3.850. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that the trial judge’s conclusions are supported by competent, substantial evidence. Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 1999). There is adequate record support for the trial judge’s conclusion that trial counsel’s performance did not fall below the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.