Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Davis v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 10, 2003 · Orfinger, Sharp, Thompson

855 So. 2d 1201; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15234; 2003 WL 22316559 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.1 See Wright v. State, 857 So.2d 861, 2003 WL 21511313 (Fla. July 3, 2003) (“Habeas corpus should not be used as a vehicle for presenting issues which should have been raised at trial and on appeal or in postconviction proceedings”).

SHARP, W., THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

. We note that this court has precluded Davis from filing any additional pro se appeals, motions, or petitions pertaining to his convictions and sentences in case No. GO-7844, unless reviewed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida, see Davis v. State, 852 So.2d 963 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); however, Davis filed this appeal prior to issuance of that mandate.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.