Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Kailing v. State

Kailing v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 3, 2003 · Sawaya, Sharp, Torpy
858 So. 2d 1094; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14925; 2003 WL 22259473 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Kailing v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

*1095SAWAYA, C.J., and TORPY, J., concur. SHARP, W., J., concurs and concurs specially, with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

SHARP, W.,

concurring and concurring specially.

I concur with the majority that this case should be affirmed, but I would add that it should be affirmed without prejudice to raise the issues in a Rule 3.850 motion.1 See Paul v. State, 830 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA2002).

. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑