Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Nickolan-Barron v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 25, 2003 · Benton, Booth, Lewis

859 So. 2d 594; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18002; 2003 WL 22768672 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Gold Coast Eagle Distributing, Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We hold that appellant’s facsimile transaction report, which indicates that appellant’s fax, i.e., her notice of appeal, was successfully transmitted to the Office of Appeals at the Agency for Workforce Innovation within the applicable time frame, constituted sufficient evidence that appellant timely faxed her notice of appeal. See Reynolds v. SV Cent. Dania Props., Inc., 849 So.2d 1181, 1182-83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Espanioly v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 768 So.2d 1230, 1230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); cf. Mendelsohn v. *595Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 851 So.2d 208, 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s order affirming the appeals referee’s determination that the appeal was untimely and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BOOTH, BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.