Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 10, 2003 · Gunther, Polen, Stevenson
860 So. 2d 529; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18767; 2003 WL 22902483 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

We deny petitioner’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc but issue the following revised opinion in lieu of our slip opinion issued on October 8, 2003:

Although we find the affidavit in support of prohibition signed by petitioner’s in-house counsel, Ms. Kittredge, meets the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(c) in this case1, we deny the petition as the motion for disqualification was legally insufficient.

GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parsons, 644 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑