Geiger v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Geiger v. State, 861 So. 2d 93 (2003)
2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18689; 2003 WL 22887852
Booth, Ervin, Kahn

Geiger v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

William Geiger petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that his plea to criminal charges was involuntary and raising other challenges to his conviction. This petition must be denied because petitioner has an adequate remedy through a motion for postconviction relief in the circuit court. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(h). In fact, Geiger’s petition suggests that he has already filed such a motion but the circuit court has been slow in disposing of the matter. Our denial of the habeas corpus petition is therefore without prejudice to Geiger’s right to petition this court for a writ of mandamus if the circuit court does not act on the motion within a reasonable time. See Bernard v. State, 734 So.2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

PETITION DENIED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
William GEIGER v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published