Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Geiger v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 9, 2003 · Booth, Ervin, Kahn

861 So. 2d 93; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18689; 2003 WL 22887852 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Crow v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

William Geiger petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that his plea to criminal charges was involuntary and raising other challenges to his conviction. This petition must be denied because petitioner has an adequate remedy through a motion for postconviction relief in the circuit court. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(h). In fact, Geiger’s petition suggests that he has already filed such a motion but the circuit court has been slow in disposing of the matter. Our denial of the habeas corpus petition is therefore without prejudice to Geiger’s right to petition this court for a writ of mandamus if the circuit court does not act on the motion within a reasonable time. See Bernard v. State, 734 So.2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

PETITION DENIED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.