Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Childers v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 10, 2003 · Salcines, Stringer, Wallace

861 So. 2d 1194; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18704; 2003 WL 22900372 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Baldwin v. Secretary, DOC (Charlotte County) (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2021)
Carter v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

STRINGER, Judge.

Roderick Childers seeks' review of the thirty-year habitual violent felony offender sentence which was imposed pursuant to a resentencing under State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999).1 Childers argues that the trial court erred when it refused to consider mitigation evidence and indicated that it would not substitute its judgment for the prior sentencing court on remand. When a defendant is’ resentenced under Thompson, the resentencing shall be conducted de novo, and the court is required to consider mitigation evidence. Webb v. State, 805 So.2d 856, 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Thus, we reverse and remand for the court to conduct a de novo sentencing hearing in this case.

Reversed and remanded.

SALCINES and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

. In Thompson, the Florida Supreme Court held that chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which created the statute under which Child-ers was originally sentenced, was unconstitutional. State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643, 646 (Fla. 1999).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.