Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Adcock v. State

Adcock v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 10, 2003 · Salcines, Silberman, Whatley
861 So. 2d 1213; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18725; 2003 WL 22900439 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Adcock v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Gordon W. Adcock challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that it was facially insufficient. Our affirmance of the trial court’s order is without prejudice to any right Adcock might have to file a facially sufficient motion raising the same claim within sixty days from the issuance of the mandate in this case.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.