Prater v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- First Union Realty Investment Corp. v. Gillis (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
- YEMC Construction & Development, Inc. v. Inter Ser, U.S.A., Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Linda M. PRATER, Appellant,
v.
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*213 Linda M. Prater, in proper person.
Shapiro & Fishman, Deerfield Beach, and Susan Minor, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Linda M. Prater brings this appeal from an Order Ratifying Clerk's Sale and Directing Issuance of Certificate of Title and Denying Defendant's Objection to Sale. Although we are not unsympathetic to appellant's rendering of her factual plight, we nevertheless affirm. In order to vacate a foreclosure sale, the trial court must find (1) that the foreclosure sale bid was grossly or startlingly inadequate; and (2) that the inadequacy of the bid resulted from some mistake, fraud, or other irregularity in the sale. Mody v. California Fed. Bank, 747 So.2d 1016, 1017-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (citing Arlt v. Buchanan, 190 So.2d 575, 577 (Fla. 1966)). In this case, appellant is unable to meet these legal requirements. Accordingly, the order under review is hereby affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.