Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

SSM v. State

SSM v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 16, 2004 · Cope, Green, and Ramirez
875 So. 2d 763; 2004 WL 1336512 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

SSM v. State

Opinion

875 So.2d 763 (2004)

S.S.M., a juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D03-3065.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 16, 2004.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General, and Adrienne Sampson, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before COPE, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, a written probation order must conform with the trial court's oral pronouncements at sentencing. We thus reverse and remand for the limited purpose of correcting the written order of probation to reflect the trial court's oral pronouncements, which in this case means that the probation order should reflect that the curfew of 8:00 p.m. does not apply if the juvenile is working past that hour.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑