Molina v. State
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Comer v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
- Carrier v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- State v. Cregan (Fla. 2005)
- Gardner v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Hamilton v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
- Cregan v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Obando v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Oscar E. MOLINA, IV, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Roy A. Heimlich, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr. and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and SHEPHERD, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We agree that the defendant was not entitled to credit for time served in an in-patient drug treatment program as required as a condition of his probation. Pennington v. State, 398 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1981); Smith v. State, 849 So.2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Toney v. State, 817 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.