Martin v. State
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Springer v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Hannah v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Wattles v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- State v. Subido (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Johnson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Rickman v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Demick v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Valentin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Sigler v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Newingham v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Warren R. MARTIN, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. See Miller v. State, 861 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). As we did in Miller, we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.
SHARP, W., MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.