C.S. v. State
C.S. v. State
863 So. 2d 1267; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 398; 2004 WL 86274
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
C.S. v. State
Opinion of the Court
C.S. challenges her commitment to a moderate risk residential facility for six months as a sentence for indirect criminal contempt. For the reasons expressed in K.C. v. State, 848 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), we reverse C.S.’s sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the requirements of section 985.216, Florida Statutes (2002).
Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.