Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Ferrari v. Lowenstein & Co., P.A.

Ferrari v. Lowenstein & Co., P.A.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 28, 2004 · Gersten, Ramirez, Wells
863 So. 2d 1286; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 621; 2004 WL 133989 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Ferrari v. Lowenstein & Co., P.A.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of unemployment benefits based on the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission’s finding of misconduct connected with work, see § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2002), as we must accept the findings of fact made by the appeals referee where the findings are supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. See St. Augustine Church v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 754 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Fink v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 665 So.2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.