Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

State v. Rodriguez

State v. Rodriguez
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 18, 2004 · Levy, Schwartz, Shevin
865 So. 2d 664; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1666; 2004 WL 298704 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Rodriguez

Opinion of the Court

LEVY, Judge.

The State of Florida appeals from a sentence imposed pursuant to a plea to a lesser included offense. We reverse.

On September 15, 2000, the State filed an Information against the Defendant, charging him with one count of cannabis trafficking. The Defendant entered a plea of no contest to the lesser included offense of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. The trial court found the Defendant guilty, withheld adjudication, and imposed one year of community control followed by one year of probation. The Defendant was required to perform 300 hours of community service with the possibility of converting the last six months of community control to probation. This appeal follows.

The State contends that the trial court erred in accepting a plea to the lesser included offense without the consent of the prosecutor. We agree. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(h) states that a defendant “may plead guilty to any lesser offense than that charged that is included in the offense charged in the indictment or information or to any lesser degree of the offense charged” with the consent of the trial court and of the prosecutor. The Record does not indicate any agreement by the State to the reduced charge. Thus, *665the trial court improvidently accepted the plea to the lesser included offense absent consent from the State. Accordingly, this case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.