Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Raia v. Raia

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 24, 2004 · Booth, Lewis, Nortwick

866 So. 2d 198; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1964; 2004 WL 329343 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Forbes v. Crosby (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s Final Order on appeal. On cross-appeal, however, we reverse in part the Final Judgment rendered May 6, 2003, and remand to the trial court to award statutory interest on Former Husband’s attorney’s fee obligation of $14,264.00 to accrue from March 7, 2003. See Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. McBro, 619 So.2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). The remaining issue on cross-appeal is without merit.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

BOOTH, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.