Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Markham v. Gold

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 3, 2004 · Gross, Hazouri, Stone

866 So. 2d 777; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2711; 2004 WL 384898 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Gold v. Rodriguez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the decision granting an agricultural classification to appellees’ property. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1998). We remand to the circuit court, which may consider the propriety of attorney’s fees on appellees’ motion for sanctions relating to their motion to strike amended complaint. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla. 2002); Bitterman v. Bitterman, 714 So.2d 356 (Fla. 1998).

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.