Markham v. Gold
Markham v. Gold
866 So. 2d 777; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2711; 2004 WL 384898
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Markham v. Gold
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the decision granting an agricultural classification to appellees’ property. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1998). We remand to the circuit court, which may consider the propriety of attorney’s fees on appellees’ motion for sanctions relating to their motion to strike amended complaint. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla. 2002); Bitterman v. Bitterman, 714 So.2d 356 (Fla. 1998).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.