Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Redoutey v. Dean

Redoutey v. Dean
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 12, 2004 · Monaco, Peterson, Thompson
867 So. 2d 638; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3080; 2004 WL 442896 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Redoutey v. Dean

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Redoutey appeals the denial by the trial court of his petition for writ of mandamus. We affirm the denial in all respects, save one. Because it appears that Mr. Redoutey falls within the definition of a “working prisoner,” he is entitled to a credit of thirty cents per day “on account of fines and costs adjudged against him or her.” See § 951.15, Fla. Stat. (2003). Thus we reverse in part, and remand to the trial court with instructions to grant the writ of mandamus with respect to the per diem charge.

*639AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and remanded with instructions.

PETERSON, THOMPSON, and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.