Venero v. State
Venero v. State
868 So. 2d 679; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4478; 2004 WL 625785
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Venero v. State
Opinion of the Court
We reverse, in part, the order denying defendant’s post-conviction relief motion. The record does not conclusively refute defendant’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to move to sever the possession of a firearm by a violent career criminal charge. Therefore, we reverse the portion of the order denying relief on that basis and remand for an evidentiary hearing.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.