James v. State
James v. State
868 So. 2d 1225; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499; 2004 WL 524908
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
James v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla. 2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2002).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.