Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Cox v. State

Cox v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 27, 2004 · Fulmer, Silberman, Wallace
869 So. 2d 27; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2371; 2004 WL 359960 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cox v. State

Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Judge.

We affirm the order of the trial court summarily denying Collie Cox’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Cox might have to file, within thirty days from the date of the mandate in this case, a rule 3.850 motion that raises a facially sufficient claim in regard to ground one of the present motion. Any such motion shall not be considered successive.

Affirmed.

FULMER and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.