Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

C.E.M. v. State

C.E.M. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 21, 2004 · Cope, Schwartz, Wells
870 So. 2d 858; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 441; 2004 WL 86441 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
C.E.M. v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Dissenting Opinion

COPE, J.,

dissenting.

The State did not make out a proper case under A.A. v. State, 461 So.2d 165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). I would reverse on authority of L.R. v. State, 557 So.2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), and Weaver v. State, 543 So.2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also State v. Pennington, 534 So.2d 393, 395-96 (Fla. 1988).

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See A.A. v. State, 461 So.2d 165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.