McCluster v. State
McCluster v. State
872 So. 2d 447; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6715; 2004 WL 1074504
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Lyell v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to any right appellant might have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), or a timely facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, raising the claim that the written sentences in counts three and four are illegal because they do not comport with the oral pronouncement.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.