Carroll v. State
Carroll v. State
872 So. 2d 1014; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7001; 2004 WL 1103335
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
Because the trial court erred in re-sentencing appellant in his absence and without counsel, and further erred in using an incorrect scoresheet to re-sentence him, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing with a corrected scoresheet, at a hearing at which he is present and represented by counsel.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.