Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Shervis v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 18, 2004 · Booth, Davis, Webster

874 So. 2d 1282; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909; 2004 WL 1362160 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Deese v. McKinnonville Hunting Club, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800 motion, in which he alleges that his sentence is illegal. We affirm the trial court’s denial as to the appellant’s claim for postconviction relief, but reverse that part of the order that prohibits the appellant from further pro se filings, because the trial court failed to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to the allegations levied against him by the trial court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

BOOTH, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.