Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

S.S.M. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 16, 2004 · Cope, Green, Ramirez

875 So. 2d 763; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8372 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

N.G. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
State v. Denya (Conn. 2010)
SDF v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
S.D.F. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, a written probation order must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing. We thus reverse and remand for the limited purpose of correcting the written order of probation to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncements, which in this case means that the probation order should reflect that the curfew of 8:00 p.m. does not apply if the juvenile is working past that hour.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.