S.S.M. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
S.S.M. v. State, 875 So. 2d 763 (2004)
2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8372
Cope, Green, Ramirez

S.S.M. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, a written probation order must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing. We thus reverse and remand for the limited purpose of correcting the written order of probation to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncements, which in this case means that the probation order should reflect that the curfew of 8:00 p.m. does not apply if the juvenile is working past that hour.

Reversed and remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
S.S.M., a juvenile v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published