S.S.M. v. State
S.S.M. v. State
875 So. 2d 763; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8372
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
S.S.M. v. State
Opinion of the Court
As the State properly concedes, a written probation order must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing. We thus reverse and remand for the limited purpose of correcting the written order of probation to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncements, which in this case means that the probation order should reflect that the curfew of 8:00 p.m. does not apply if the juvenile is working past that hour.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.