Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Smith v. State

Smith v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 23, 2004 · Farmer, Hazouri, Stevenson
876 So. 2d 684; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8802; 2004 WL 1393568 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Smith v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As we have held before, the Florida Sexual Predators Act does not deny procedural due process under the Florida Constitution. See e.g. White v. State, 866 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the order denying relief and again certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

FARMER, C.J., STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑