Seminole County v. Osborne
Seminole County v. Osborne
876 So. 2d 737; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10466; 2004 WL 1562200
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Seminole County v. Osborne
Opinion of the Court
In this workers’ compensation case, we reverse the award of an EEG, biofeedback, a repeat EMG/nerve conduction study and a bone scan because the managed care grievance procedure had not been exhausted and, therefore, the judge of compensation claims lacked jurisdiction to consider the claim for those treatment modalities. See Castro v. AT & T Wireless Servs., Inc., 780 So.2d 917 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). In all other respects, the order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.