Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Knadle v. Kennedy

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 16, 2004 · Griffin, Pleus, Sharp

876 So. 2d 1281; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10566; 2004 WL 1584901 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Magical Cruise Co. v. Dragovich (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

SHARP, W., and PLEUS, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.,

dissenting.

In my view, there is more to judicial oversight of discovery than just protecting privileges or trade secrets. Issues of cost, burden, relevance and ulterior motives also require attention, especially when non-parties are involved. To do this accurately usually requires more time than trial judges have to devote to it. This ease appears to me to be an unhappy example.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.