Knadle v. Kennedy

Florida District Courts of Appeal July 16, 2004

Knadle v. Kennedy, 876 So. 2d 1281 (2004)

2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10566; 2004 WL 1584901

Griffin, Pleus, Sharp

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

SHARP, W., and PLEUS, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.,

dissenting.

In my view, there is more to judicial oversight of discovery than just protecting privileges or trade secrets. Issues of cost, burden, relevance and ulterior motives also require attention, especially when non-parties are involved. To do this accurately usually requires more time than trial judges have to devote to it. This ease appears to me to be an unhappy example.

Reference

Full Case Name: Michael D. KNADLE v. Roger B. KENNEDY, Sr.
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published