Williams v. State
Williams v. State
878 So. 2d 455; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10824; 2004 WL 1621432
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Williams v. State
Opinion of the Court
On remand, the trial court is directed to strike the requirement of “hard labor” from the defendant’s sentence. Holman v. State, 740 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Burney v. State, 705 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). In all other respects, the trial court’s order dated November 4, 2003, denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.